· 6/22/1961
Daru v. Martin
Citations
- 363 P.2d 61
- 89 Ariz. 373
- 1961 Ariz. LEXIS 244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that, where the credibility of the government’s witnesses was a serious issue in a criminal case, a successor judge should not rule on a motion for new trial
- “Despite the common assumption that presentation of argument is a right, it is not one of an absolute nature except where expressly made so by constitutional or statutory provision.”
- jury argument is subject to reasonable regulation
- jury argument is subject to reasonable regulation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jennings, Struckmeyer, Bernstein, Lockwood, Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.