Skip to main content
· 6/22/1961

Daru v. Martin

Citations

  • 363 P.2d 61
  • 89 Ariz. 373
  • 1961 Ariz. LEXIS 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, where the credibility of the government’s witnesses was a serious issue in a criminal case, a successor judge should not rule on a motion for new trial
  • “Despite the common assumption that presentation of argument is a right, it is not one of an absolute nature except where expressly made so by constitutional or statutory provision.”
  • jury argument is subject to reasonable regulation
  • jury argument is subject to reasonable regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jennings, Struckmeyer, Bernstein, Lockwood, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.