Skip to main content
· 10/20/1933

Dart v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 29 B.T.A. 125
  • 1933 BTA LEXIS 990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that RCW 18.27.040 “was intended to authorize” attorney fees to prevailing party
  • relying on relevant recordings of committee hearings and floor debates to discern legislative intent
  • relying on relevant recordings of committee hearings and floor debates to discern legislative intent
  • reviewing recordings of committee hearings and floor debates to discern legislative intent
  • “[T]he general rule in Washington, commonly referred to as the American rule, is that each party in a civil action will pay its own attorney fees and costs.”
  • explaining that RCW 18. 27. 040 \ was intended to authorize\ attorney fees to prevailing party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teammell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.