Dart Oil & Gas Corp. v. Public Service Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an inmate deprived of clothing in a cold cell for several days did not establish an Eighth Amendment violation
• reasoning that “[d]eprivation of other toiletries for approximately two weeks—while perhaps uncomfortable—does not pose such an obvious risk to an inmate’s health or safety” to offend the Eighth Amendment
• noting that response must be \reasonable\ to negate claim of deliberate indiffer- ence
• explaining difference between state of mind requirements for “excessive force” claims and for “conditions of confinement” claims
• “[T]his court and other circuits have recognized that deprivation of toiletries, and especially toilet paper, can rise to the level of unconstitutional conditions of confinement
• “[T]his court and other circuits have recognized that deprivation of toiletries, and especially toilet paper, can rise to the level of unconstitutional conditions of confinement....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).