Darryl Shirley v. James Yates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “a remand based on a defect other than lack of subject-matter jurisdiction must be effected by granting a timely filed motion”
• reversing district court for sua sponte remanding for failure to properly allege diversity jurisdiction
• “Under this statutory scheme, a district court may remand a case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time[.]”
• “[A] district court may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, and such an order is not reviewable.”
• “[A] district court may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, and such an order is not reviewable.”
• “[A] district court may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, and such an order is not reviewable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).