Darrow v. Dillingham & Murphy, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer did not engage in “extreme and outrageous” conduct by allegedly retaliating against employee for refusing to participate in unlawful billing
• allegations that office manager was stripped of her duties, blocked from access to billing software, and employer’s placement of an advertisement for a new office manager did not state an IIED claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).