Darrington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling motion for new trial without a hearing when “there were no issues presented in appellant’s motion for new trial which required proof to be developed outside the record”
• no abuse of discretion to overrule motion for new trial without a hearing when “there were no issues presented in appellant’s motion for new trial which required proof to be developed outside the record”
• no abuse of discretion to overrule motion for new trial without a hearing when \there were no issues presented in appellant's motion for new trial which required proof to be developed outside the record\
• no abuse of discretion to overrule motion for new trial without a hearing when “there were no issues presented in appellant’s motion for new trial which required proof to be developed outside the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).