Skip to main content
· 9/26/1989

Darrell W. McAfee v. 5th Circuit Judges

Citations

  • 884 F.2d 221
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 382
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14445
  • 1989 WL 103151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that exhaustion of administrative remedies under the FTCA is jurisdictional
  • \The federal judges were performing a judicial function by ruling in McAfee's case . . . .\
  • \The federal judges were performing a judicial function by ruling in McAfee's case . . . .\
  • “Exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit under the [FTCA], and absent compliance with the statute’s requirement the district court was without jurisdiction.”
  • “Exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit under the [FTCA], and absent compliance with the statute’s requirement the district court was without jurisdiction.”
  • “Exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit under the [FTCA], and absent compliance with the statute’s requirement the district court was without jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Higginbotham, Per Curiam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.