Darrell Prows v. Federal Bureau of Prisons United States Parole Commission Anthony Belaski, Warden, in His Official Capacity

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding prerelease custody statute does not bestow upon federal inmates an enforceable entitlement to any particular form of prerelease custody and provides merely an authorization, rather than a mandate, for nonprison confinement.”
• holding prerelease custody statute does not bestow upon federal inmates an enforceable entitlement to any particular form of prerelease custody and provides merely an authorization, rather than a mandate, for nonprison confinement.”
• holding prerelease custody statute “does not bestow upon federal inmates an enforceable entitlement to any particular form of prerelease custody” and provides merely “an authorization, rather than a mandate, for nonprison confinement.”
• “Nothing in § 3624(c) indicates any intention to encroach upon the Bureau’s authority to decide where the prisoner may be confined during the pre-release period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).