· 8/13/1999
Darrell Keith Rich v. Arthur Calderon, Warden
Citations
- 187 F.3d 1064
- 99 Daily Journal DAR 8363
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6518
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18789
- 1999 WL 606998
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that habeas corpus 8 “was never meant to be a fishing expedition for habeas petitioners to ‘explore their case in 9 search of its existence.’”
- explaining that habeas corpus 14 is not a fishing expedition for petitioners to “explore their case in search of its existence”
- noting that petitioners are not entitled to go on fishing expeditions in search of evidence that may or may not support their claims
- stating that a habeas proceeding “was never meant to be a fishing expedition for habeas petitioners to explore their case in search of its existence” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- discovery 11 | was not warranted where none of Petitioner’s claims was supported by evidence 12 | showing colorable entitlement to relief
- “Discovery is available only in the 12 discretion of the court and for good cause shown.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pregerson, Kleinfeld, Hawkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.