Skip to main content
· 8/13/1999

Darrell Keith Rich v. Arthur Calderon, Warden

Citations

  • 187 F.3d 1064
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 8363
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6518
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18789
  • 1999 WL 606998

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that habeas corpus 8 “was never meant to be a fishing expedition for habeas petitioners to ‘explore their case in 9 search of its existence.’”
  • explaining that habeas corpus 14 is not a fishing expedition for petitioners to “explore their case in search of its existence”
  • noting that petitioners are not entitled to go on fishing expeditions in search of evidence that may or may not support their claims
  • stating that a habeas proceeding “was never meant to be a fishing expedition for habeas petitioners to explore their case in search of its existence” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • discovery 11 | was not warranted where none of Petitioner’s claims was supported by evidence 12 | showing colorable entitlement to relief
  • “Discovery is available only in the 12 discretion of the court and for good cause shown.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Kleinfeld, Hawkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.