Skip to main content
· 6/3/1992

Darrell E. NELSON, Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee

Citations

  • 966 F.2d 363
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12347
  • 1992 WL 115809

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but more than a scintilla of evidence
  • “If the Appeals Council does not consider the new evidence, a reviewing court may remand the case to the Appeals Council if the evidence is new and material.”
  • “[If] the Appeals Council considers the new evidence but declines to review the case, [the reviewing court] determine[s] whether there is substantial evidence in the administrative record, which now includes the new evidence, to support the ALJ’s decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.