Darr v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio

Citations

• 214 N.E.3d 1284
• 2023 Ohio 1723

Syllabus

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the medical Board's order revoking appellant's license to practice medicine was supported by reliable probative and substantial evidence as the record shows that the Board determined the weight and credibility of the conflicting evidence and expressly relied on the testimony of qualified experts who opined that appellant is unable to practice according to acceptable and prevailing standards of care by reason of a Mild Neurocognitive Disorder that adversely affects his cognitive skills. Judgment affirmed.