Darr v. Bankston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s claim that his convictions should have merged “is a claim challenging his convictions and not a claim that his resulting sentence was void”
• claim that indictment failed to alleged essential elements of crime “relates to the validity of [the defendant’s] conviction, not his sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).