DaRoza v. Arter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[a]ll three requirements of [the DeVaux] test must be met to establish the relationship,” and concluding no implied attorney-client relationship was formed because plaintiff could not establish the first prong of the DeVaux test
• reasoning that establishing the first prong requires plaintiff to expressly seek the advice or assistance of the attorneys
• “We conclude that the entry of summary judgment for the defendants was proper because the [defendants] owed no duty to the plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).