Darold Maxfield v. Cintas Corporation No. 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment where the employee could show the employer’s stated reason for firing him was false but could not show it was pretext for racial discrimination
• “USERRA defines ‘benefit of employment’ very broadly . . . .”
• transfer to a job with less desirable hours
• reversing summary judgment on US-ERRA claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).