Darnell's Ex'rs v. Darnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that unjust enrichment claim was precluded by a contract because plaintiff never asserted that any aspect of the contract was unenforceable
• granting motion to dismiss breach of contract claim asserted under Colorado law for failure to state a claim
• finding no fraud in which party “had access to the very information that would have led to the conclusion” that the other party had made a false representation
• finding no fraud in which party “had access to the very information that would have led to the conclusion” that the other party had made a false representation
• “Plaintiff fails to identify contractual provisions suggesting [Defendant’s alleged obligation] and, as a result, fails to state a claim for breach of contract.”
• “Although the securities industry may, in a general sense, be heavily regulated, the specific service that Computershare provides is not a practical necessity to members of the public[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).