Skip to main content

Darnell v. State

Citations

  • 43 Tex. 147

Syllabus

<p>1. Range—Accustomed range.—In an indictment for fraudulently driving cattle from their accustomed range it is not necessary to describe the range nor to allege how far the animal had been driven.</p> <p>2. Charge of court.—A charge of the court which calls particular attention to the facts relied on by the parties and indicates the law upon such facts, is proper.</p> <p>3. Claim of ownership in charge of theft.—It is error to exclude from the jury evidence that the defendant claimed the property as his own when charged with the theft.</p>

Judges: Devine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.