Darnell v. State
Citations
- 43 Tex. 147
Syllabus
<p>1. Range—Accustomed range.—In an indictment for fraudulently driving cattle from their accustomed range it is not necessary to describe the range nor to allege how far the animal had been driven.</p> <p>2. Charge of court.—A charge of the court which calls particular attention to the facts relied on by the parties and indicates the law upon such facts, is proper.</p> <p>3. Claim of ownership in charge of theft.—It is error to exclude from the jury evidence that the defendant claimed the property as his own when charged with the theft.</p>
Judges: Devine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.