Darnell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “were we to recognize that all communications between [emergency responders] and patients were privileged, we would be limiting the amount of testimony which could be offered at trial and, thereby, impeding the search for truth,” a “policy decisionf best left] to the legislature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blevins v. Clark
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-12-19· cited 5×
• State v. Pelley
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-03-19· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Corder v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-08-20· cited 47×
• Shultz v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1981-03-16· cited 44×
• Springer v. Byram
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1894-02-15· cited 43×
• Doss v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1971-03-16· cited 28×
• Daymude v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-09-13· cited 15×
• Scroggins v. Uniden Corp. of America
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-04-16· cited 13×
• Thomas v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-10-12· cited 11×
• Bishop v. Goins
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-02-19· cited 11×
• Sims v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1992-10-28· cited 6×