Skip to main content
· 11/20/1972

Darman v. Dunderdale

Citations

  • 289 N.E.2d 847
  • 362 Mass. 633
  • 1972 Mass. LEXIS 831

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • eminent domain taking cutting off access does not give rise to easement by necessity when necessity did not exist at time of original conveyance
  • eminent domain taking cutting off access does not give rise to easement by necessity when necessity did not exist at time of original conveyance
  • \the only easement rights in the land shown on [the plan] that [the grantor] would have retained and could have conveyed . . . would have been rights appurtenant to the lots [the grantor] still owned\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro, Reardon, Quirico, Braucher, Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.