Darley v. Texas Uvatan, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sets out requirements for statement of facts on appeal from a proceeding in which an electronic tape recording has been made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Henning v. Henning
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-15· cited 14×
• National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-01-28· cited 4×
• Fazio v. Hames
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-09-27· cited 2×
• Lauterbach v. Lieber Enterprises, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1988-06-28· cited 1×
• Uptmore v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-13· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1982-06-02· cited 157×

Other cases named Darley v. Texas Uvatan, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Darley v. Texas Uvatan, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1988-05-31· cited 3×