· 2/3/1978
Darlene GUSE Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 570 F.2d 679
- 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 946
- 24 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1163
- 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12772
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- while noting that Rule 39 initially vests discretion in the courts of appeals, deferred to district court’s discretion to determine costs taxable under subsection e
- even after plaintiff lost on appeal, there was no final judgment against plaintiff, and district court was free to allow plaintiff to file amended complaint putting forth new legal theory
- “Pursuant to the provision of [FRAP] 39(e
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Castle, Pell, Bauer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.