Skip to main content
· 2/3/1978

Darlene GUSE Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 570 F.2d 679
  • 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 946
  • 24 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1163
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12772

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • while noting that Rule 39 initially vests discretion in the courts of appeals, deferred to district court’s discretion to determine costs taxable under subsection e
  • even after plaintiff lost on appeal, there was no final judgment against plaintiff, and district court was free to allow plaintiff to file amended complaint putting forth new legal theory
  • “Pursuant to the provision of [FRAP] 39(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castle, Pell, Bauer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.