Darius Trimell Campbell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that actual bias is “the existence of a state of mind that leads to an inference that the person will not act with entire impartiality[,]” unlike implied bias, which is “presumed as [a] matter of law” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that actual bias is “the existence of a state of mind that leads to an inference that the person will not act with entire impartiality[,]” unlike implied bias, which is “presumed as [a] matter of law” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that actual bias is “the existence of a state of mind that leads to an inference that the person will not act with entire 16 impartiality[,]” unlike implied bias, which is “presumed as [a] matter of law” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• declining to categorically impute bias to co-workers of key witnesses where no controlling authority presumed such bias
• declining to find implied-in-law bias when a juror was a coworker of police officers who testified in a criminal trial
• noting that although “little case law ex- plores the outer boundary of the kinship category” of juror bias, some courts find “implied bias whenever a juror shares ‘any degree of kinship with a prin- cipal in a case’” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).