Darius Scott v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the ALJ must sufficiently articulate his assessment of the evidence to assure the court that he has considered the important evidence and allow the court to trace his path of reasoning
• stating that a “mere scintilla” is not substantial evidence
• stating that a “mere scintilla” is not substantial evidence
• remanding where the ALJ “failed to articulate adequately the bases for his conclusions”
• ALJ must provide sufficient detail in analysis to allow a court to trace the path of their reasoning
• ALJ must supply level of detail in decision that permits meaningful judicial review and allows ALJ to trace path of ALJ’s reasoning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).