Darin v. Olivero-Huffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner’s care packages and regular communications with his son and son’s school showed “nothing more” than his “intention to be involved in his child’s life”
• finding wrongful retention occurred when respondent “made clear” to petitioner that child would permanently reside in United States
• setting forth standard of review and explaining that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction where the movant failed to show likelihood of success on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).