Darian v. University of Massachusetts Boston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although “pregnancy per se is not covered by the ADA, the Act does not necessarily exclude all pregnancy-related conditions and complications”
• finding at summary judgment stage that late-term severe pain and paralyzing uterine contractions constituted a disability under the ADA
• denying summary judgment because (1) plaintiff's severe pain and paralyzing uterine contractions were not the product of a normal pregnancy; (2) the limited duration of her condition did not preclude a finding of substantial limitation, but rather was only one factor to consider; and (3
• “reasonable accommodation” ordinarily an issue of fact, but summary judgment nonetheless appropriate where record contains undisputed facts demonstrating such accommodation for disabled student
• “By its terms, though pregnancy per se is not covered by the ADA, the Act does not necessarily exclude all pregnancy-related conditions and complications.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).