Skip to main content
· 2/10/2006

Darell Nash, Sr. v. Michelle Eberlin

Citations

  • 437 F.3d 519
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3233
  • 2006 WL 305523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “manifest-weight- of-the-evidence claim did not raise an issue of federal law”
  • “Loveday prohibits the imposition of a general rule requiring district courts to review the transcript in all cases, but it also does not prevent us from remanding for such a review if we believe that extra information is required.”
  • “Loveday prohibits the imposition of a general rule requiring district courts to review the transcript in all cases, but it also does not prevent us from remanding for such a review if we believe that extra information is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Rogers, McKeague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.