Darel v. Pennsylvania Mfrs. Ass'n Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing PIP coverage as a “social necessity” requiring “the broadest application consistent with the statutory language”
• “We are confident that the world will continue to turn if judges are allowed to correct their mistakes.”
• “Plaintiff, as operator of a bicycle, was within the definition of a ‘pedestrian’ in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(h) . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).