Darel E. Moon v. Transport Drivers, Inc. And U.S. Department of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the proximity in time between protected activity and adverse employment action may give rise to an inference of a causal .connection”
• finding that driver had engaged in protected activity under the STAA where driver had made only oral complaints to supervisors
• finding that driver had engaged in protected activity under the STAA where driver had made only oral complaints to supervisors
• stating that “proximity in time between protected activity and adverse employment action may give rise to an inference of causal connection,” but also noting that “temporal proximity alone will not support an inference in the face of compelling evidence [otherwise.]”
• setting forth elements of prima facie whistleblower retaliation case under Surface Transportation Assistance Act
• same, under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act, 49 U.S.C. S 2305(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).