· 1/31/1955
Darden v. Texas
Citations
- 348 U.S. 930
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a district court abuses its discretion only “when the discovery is so limited as to affect a party’s substantial rights”
- applying the proxy solicitation rules to press releases that “constitute a step in a chain of communications designed ultimately to [request the furnishing of proxies]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.