Skip to main content
· 1/31/1955

Darden v. Texas

Citations

  • 348 U.S. 930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a district court abuses its discretion only “when the discovery is so limited as to affect a party’s substantial rights”
  • applying the proxy solicitation rules to press releases that “constitute a step in a chain of communications designed ultimately to [request the furnishing of proxies]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.