Darden v. Daimlerchrysler North America Holding Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a parent corporation will not be held liable for the torts of its subsidiary unless the court has reason to pierce the corporate veil or to find that the tortious conduct was pursuant to an agency relationship
• noting conclusory statements from the plaintiff are “insufficient to overcome a defendant’s sworn affidavit that he was not served”
• “Conclusory statements are insufficient to overcome a defendant’s sworn affidavit that he was not served.”
• “Conclusory statements are insufficient to overcome a defendant’s sworn affidavit that he was not served.”
• “Conclusory statements are insufficient to overcome a defendant’s sworn affidavit that he was not served.”
• “[I]n considering a motion to dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(5) for insufficiency of process, a Court must look to matters outside the complaint to determine whether it has jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).