D'Arc Turcotte v. Estate of LaRose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs were entitled to pre- and post-judgment interest because to not award interest would fail to “fully compensate[]” plaintiffs
• holding plaintiffs were entitled to pre- and post-judgment interest because to not award interest would fail to “fully compensate! ]” plaintiffs
• “Plaintiffs who are awarded interest will be made whole; those not awarded interest will not, contrary to the purpose of compensatory damages.”
• pre-judgment interest is mandatory only “where the damages are liquidated or reasonably ascertainable as of the date of the tort”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).