· 7/7/1924
Darby v. Tiffany
Citations
- 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 647
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an antitrust plaintiff must show that the defendant’s “illegal conduct was a material cause of its injury”
- plaintiff not entitled to recovery where injury was caused by cash flow problems, inability to raise money through new stock offerings, and failure of marketing arrangement
- plaintiff that failed to establish causal relationship between its financial difficulties and defendant’s alleged antitrust violations did not prove fact of injury due to claimed violations
- plaintiff that failed to establish causal relationship between its financial difficulties and defendant’s alleged antitrust violations did not prove fact of injury due to claimed violations
- “[A]lthough injunctive relief may be appropriate where damages 12 are not, in the circumstances present here, the failure to prove the fact of injury is 13 conclusive as to both forms of relief.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chittenden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.