· 4/7/1975
Darby v. New Castle Gunning Bedford Education Ass'n
Citations
- 336 A.2d 209
- 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3501
- 1975 Del. LEXIS 606
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that mandamus cannot issue to compel a discretionary 3 (7
- “[I]n view of the substantial public interest in the statute, we consider the merits of the appeal under the well-established public-interest-exception-to-the-mootness doctrine.”
- “The writ is extraordinary and appropriate only when a plaintiff is able to establish a clear legal right to the performance of a non-discretionary duty.” (citations omitted)
- “Agreement by its nature presumes the power and discretion to disagree until and unless there is a meeting of the minds of the parties in the same intention.”
- “Agreement by its nature presumes the power and discretion to disagree until and unless there is a meeting of the minds of the parties in the same intention.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herrmann, Duffy, McNeilly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.