Darby v. Dakota

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equitable estoppel did not apply where plaintiff’s allegation of wrongdoing against defendant, Turn, was predicated on the Customer Agreement between plaintiffs and Verizon
• holding that the choice-of-law provision would not govern an equitable estoppel claim to compel arbitration under the FAA because the signatory and nonsignatory “never agreed” to be governed by the choice-of-law provision
• “Turn concedes, and we agree, that there is no material difference between New York and California’s equitable estoppel laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).