D'Arata v. New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant must have subjectively recognized that his action or inaction was inappropriate in light of the risk
• holding that a defendant must have subjectively recognized that his action or inaction was inappropriate in light of the risk
• holding that a defendant must have subjectively recognized that his action or inaction was inappropriate in light of the risk
• holding that a defendant must have subjectively recognized that his action or inaction was inappropriate in light of the risk
• noting that “an officer’s response to a perceived risk must be more than merely negligent or simply unreasonable” to qualify as deliberate indifference
• noting that deliberate indifference “is a question of fact subject to demonstration in the usual ways, including inference from circumstantial evidence” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).