Skip to main content
· 10/25/1990

Daramola v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Citations

  • 757 F. Supp. 657
  • 1990 WL 267403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that property transfer statements are public records subject to judicial notice for consideration on a motion to dismiss
  • noting that although courts take judicial notice of judicial records, “[t]aking judicial notice of these documents does not mean that the court accepts as true all the contentions and allegations of the parties contained therein”
  • taking judicial notice of documents filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Columbia County, Pennsylvania
  • “[A] First Amendment retaliation claim would have accrued after any individual act which was intended to punish the person exercising their First Amendment rights.”
  • “[A] First Amendment retaliation claim would have accrued after any individual act which was intended to punish the person exercising their First Amendment rights.”
  • “[A] First Amendment retaliation claim would have accrued after any individual act which was intended to punish the person exercising their First Amendment rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.