Dao Vang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that imputation applies for purposes of whether a minor has “firmly resettled” in another country
• holding that the fact that an alien permitted his status in a third country to expire after entering the United States does not impact finding of firm resettlement
• allowing third-country status to expire after entering the United States does not effect the finding of firm resettlement
• allowing third-country status to expire after entering the United States does not effect the finding of firm resettlement
• upholding firm resettlement rule applied to petitioner from Laos who was firmly resettled in France and ordered removed to Thailand, France, or Laos, in that order of preference
• rejecting an alien’s assertion that he could not be firmly resettled after he allowed the travel documents issued by the country of refuge to expire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).