California Court of Appeal· 3/29/1950
Danz v. Danz
Citations
- 96 Cal. App. 2d 709
- 216 P.2d 162
- 1950 Cal. App. LEXIS 1432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no abuse of discretion in trial court's refusal to enforce husband's obligation to pay combined alimony and child support beyond remarriage of wife
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Di Corpo v. Di CorpoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-12-15· cited 45×
- Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-12-10· cited 42×
- Hale v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-05-08· cited 34×
- Hatch v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-12-10· cited 22×
- Greeley v. Suey Sing Benevolent Assn.California Court of Appeal· 1938-09-27· cited 7×
- Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-09-13· cited 7×
- Pemberton v. PembertonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-01-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.