Skip to main content
· 3/30/2010

Danvers Savings Bank v. Alexander (In Re Alexander)

Citations

  • 427 B.R. 183
  • 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 868
  • 2010 WL 1328301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A check does not constitute a representation that there are sufficient funds in the account to cover the check.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank J. Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.