· 2/8/2000
Danuta Ryduchowski v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Citations
- 203 F.3d 135
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1660
- 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,308
- 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that a plaintiff may counter a defendant’s affirmative defense to an EPA claim with evidence of pretext and that the plaintiff need not establish an intent to discriminate
- “[T]he EPA does not require a plaintiff 47 to establish an employer’s discriminatory intent.”
- “[T]he EPA does not require a plaintiff to establish an employer’s discriminatory intent.”
- describing shifting burdens in an Equal Pay Act case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Miner, Leval
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.