Skip to main content
· 2/8/2000

Danuta Ryduchowski v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

Citations

  • 203 F.3d 135
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1660
  • 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,308
  • 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a plaintiff may counter a defendant’s affirmative defense to an EPA claim with evidence of pretext and that the plaintiff need not establish an intent to discriminate
  • “[T]he EPA does not require a plaintiff 47 to establish an employer’s discriminatory intent.”
  • “[T]he EPA does not require a plaintiff to establish an employer’s discriminatory intent.”
  • describing shifting burdens in an Equal Pay Act case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Miner, Leval

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.