Dantzler v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that claim-processing rules can still be mandatory
• “[T]he failure of an NTA to include time and date information does not deprive the immigration court of subject matter jurisdiction.”
• “[T]he failure of an NTA to include time and date information does not deprive the immigration court of subject matter jurisdiction.”
• “Consistent with our own precedent and that of every other circuit to consider this issue, we hold that the failure of an NTA to include time and date information does not deprive the immigration court of subject matter jurisdiction.”
• “Consistent with our own precedent and that of every other circuit to consider this issue, we hold that the failure of an NTA to include time and date information does not deprive the immigration court of subject matter jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).