Skip to main content
· 6/27/2002

Dantley v. Howard University

Citations

  • 801 A.2d 962
  • 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 365
  • 2002 WL 1378247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Strass and holding that there was a genuine dispute of fact as to whether the plaintiff was fired consistent with restructuring plan
  • relying on Strass and holding that there was a genuine dispute of fact as to whether the plaintiff was fired consistent with restructuring plan
  • appellant might have “had an implied contract by virtue of language in the [Howard University] Handbook”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz, Reid, Pryor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.