· 6/27/2002
Dantley v. Howard University
Citations
- 801 A.2d 962
- 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 365
- 2002 WL 1378247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relying on Strass and holding that there was a genuine dispute of fact as to whether the plaintiff was fired consistent with restructuring plan
- relying on Strass and holding that there was a genuine dispute of fact as to whether the plaintiff was fired consistent with restructuring plan
- appellant might have “had an implied contract by virtue of language in the [Howard University] Handbook”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruiz, Reid, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.