Dante Askew v. HRFC, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that federal courts sitting in diversity must, “if necessary, predict how the state’s highest court would rule on an unsettled issue” (citation omitted)
• adding that “[a] jury could find that attempting to collect a debt by falsely claiming that legal actions have been taken against a debtor violates section 14-202(6)”
• explaining that we may predict state law when an issue is not settled
• explaining that we may predict state law when an issue is not settled
• explaining that we may predict state law when an issue is not settled
• explaining that we may predict state law when an issue is not settled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).