Dansby v. STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the predecessor to 40-2A-(9)(1) and stating that \[t]his court has previously reviewed the statutory requirements . . . and held that such requirements are unambiguous and require strict compliance\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).