Dansby v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rebriefing ordered under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.5 because of heightened standard in death-penalty cases
• the purpose of the exacting requirements of Rule 37.5 is to comply with federal law by providing a comprehensive state-court review of a petitioner’s claim, thus eliminating the need for multiple post-conviction actions in federal court
• finding abstract deficient and ordering counsel to refile his brief
• finding abstract deficient and ordering counsel to refile his brief
• finding abstract deficient and ordering counsel to refile his brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dansby v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-09-19· cited 25×
• Latta v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-11-07· cited 23×
• Ward v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-01-31· cited 7×
• Pilcher v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-05-22· cited 3×
• Baldwin v. Baldwin
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-05-30· cited 2×
• Collins v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-12-15
• Spears v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-02-11

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Echols v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-06-07· cited 54×
• Wooten v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-10-07· cited 50×
• Stanton v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-05-03· cited 33×
• McGehee v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-05-03· cited 25×
• Porter v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-03-05· cited 17×