C.D. California· 4/7/2004

Danoff v. United States

Citations

324 F. Supp. 2d 1086
93 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2640
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13569
2004 WL 1559788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“courts uniformly have 10 held that equitable principles, including the doctrine of equitable estoppel, cannot toll statutes of 11 limitation in tax refund suits”
“courts 6 uniformly have held that equitable principles, including the doctrine of equitable estoppel, cannot 7 toll statutes of limitation in tax refund suits”
“courts uniformly have 15 held that equitable principles, including the doctrine of equitable estoppel, cannot toll statutes of 16 limitation in tax refund suits”
“courts uniformly have held 11 that equitable principles, including the doctrine of equitable estoppel, cannot toll statutes of 12 limitation in tax refund suits”
“courts uniformly have held 23 that equitable principles, including the doctrine of equitable estoppel, cannot toll statutes of 24 limitation in tax refund suits”
unless a taxpayer has “duly filed” a claim with the IRS for a refund of Federal taxes, 26 the district court is without jurisdiction over the claim for a refund

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Danoff v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.