Skip to main content
· 2/14/1992

Dano MAGO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON INC.; Joseph Ulloa, Defendants-Appellants

Citations

  • 956 F.2d 932
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 2100
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1309
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1694
  • 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,350
  • 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 178
  • 1992 WL 24102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Congress did not intend, in enacting Title VII, to preclude arbitration of claims under the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Goodwin, Kozinski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.