Danny Waller v. Michael Groose Robert Acree Henry Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “hold[ing] that the § 1915([e]) dismissal of [the plaintiff’s] first claim has res judicata effect and establishes that [the plaintiff’s] second, identical claim is frivolous for § 1915([e]) purposes”
• “We may affirm the judgment on any grounds supported by the record, even if not relied upon by the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).