Danny T. Barnes, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding any procedural defect with respect to notice of a promotion delay to be harmless when the serviceman was provided an oppor- tunity to respond and no action or decision is made against him in the interim
• “It is well-established that although the merits of military promotion decisions are nonjusticiable, a challenge to the particular procedure followed in rendering a military decision may present a justiciable controversy.”
• “We apply the same standard of review as the United States Court of Federal Claims, which means ‘we will not disturb the decision of the corrections board unless it is arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial 10 evidence.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).