Danny Ray Hill v. Marvin D. Morrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “in order to establish a remedy is ‘inadequate or ineffective’ under § 2255, there must be more than a procedural barrier to bringing a § 2255 petition”
• determining that a district court lacks jurisdiction to consider an unauthorized Section 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus
• noting that § 2255 relief is not inadequate or ineffective merely because permission to file a second or successive § 2255 petition has been denied
• stating that it is well settled that “a collateral challenge to a federal conviction or sentence must generally be raised in a motion to vacate filed in the sentencing court under § 2255”
• stating that it is well settled that “a collateral challenge to a federal conviction or sentence must generally be raised in a motion to vacate filed in the sentencing court under § 2255”
• stating that it is well settled that “a collateral challenge to a federal conviction or sentence must generally be raised in a motion to vacate filed in the sentencing court under § 2255”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).