Danny R. Slawnikowski v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a party seeking a spoliation sanction must make some showing indicating that the destroyed evidence would have been relevant to the contested issue”
• “When faced with an undecided question of Kentucky law, a federal court sitting in diversity must make the best prediction, even in the absence of direct state precedent, of what the Kentucky Supreme Court would do if it were confronted with the question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).